Why organisations need good signal systems (and not just more consultants)
Leadership in big organisations is, quite literally, blind. Not in a tragic way, more like kindly, sensible blindness. No CEO should know what every person is doing at 10:17 on a Tuesday. That would be exhausting, weird, and a terrible use of their brain cells.
I’ve spent a big part of my career inside large organisations — complex, global, endlessly fascinating systems. And over the years, I’ve come to realise that these organisations aren’t so different from the human body. They have organs, nerves, arteries, and sometimes chronic pains that flare up just when things seem to be running smoothly. The parallels are too striking to ignore.
Because being blind doesn’t mean you should be deaf, numb, or disconnected. You don’t need to watch every task, but you do need a reliable nervous system; a set of signals and feedback loops that tell you when the machine is humming and when something is burning.
Let me explain with a body metaphor. It’s gross, it’s biological, and it’s very useful.
⸻
Organs, microbiomes, and shaky dashboards
Think of your organisation as a living body.
• The heart is operations, pumping resources and cash through the veins to keep everything alive.
• The digestive tract — production and delivery teams — converts inputs into a source of energy that sustains everything else.
• The brain is leadership, setting direction and making trade-offs, but only acting on what it senses.
• And then there’s the microbiome: the cross-functional teams, the small working groups, the oddball people with weird expertise who quietly transform chaos into useful stuff.
Most days, everything runs without fanfare. The brain doesn’t consciously regulate each cell. That’s fine. The problem starts when the microbiome goes a little rogue: a few toxic processes creep in, workflows clog, misinformation leaks through. The body starts to feel tired. Deadlines slip. Morale dips. Now the brain notices.
Enter the organisational doctor — let’s call them Dr. McKinsey — who appears with a prescription pad. “Take this restructuring pill,” they say. “It’ll kill half the bacteria, but it will reset the system.” There will possibly be some side-effects: productivity might drop, morale will wobble, and overall trust in leadership will erode. But later you bring in probiotics: new hires, new processes, new slogans about culture and agility. Slowly, balance returns. The gut stabilises.
This cycle is familiar because it works. Sort of. But it’s also wasteful, risky, and demoralising.
⸻
Why antibiotics are a bad first reflex
Antibiotics — the big reorganisations — are tempting because they promise fast change. They let leadership act without needing to understand the messy, granular causes of the problem. But antibiotics are blunt instruments. They wipe out diversity, they slow processes, and they create dependence on external “fixers.”
Good health is not built around periodic crises followed by radical cures. It’s built on signals: steady, trusted measures that show where the system needs attention before it collapses.
Imagine if your brain had to wait until you could barely breathe before caring about your lungs. That’d be a terrible design. Instead, we measure blood pressure, check temperature, notice small aches and pains — and act early.
Organisations need the same. Clear goals are the vital signs. Regular reporting against those goals is the routine check-up. When the indicators drift, leadership investigates the root cause, not just the symptom.
⸻
What a good organisational “nervous system” looks like
Here are the traits of feedback systems that actually help leadership act — without being obsessive micromanagers:
1. Clear, aligned goals. If teams chase different goals, signals conflict and become noise. Decide what matters, and make sure the metrics measure the things that matter.
2. Trusted, local metrics. The people closest to the work should own the measurements; they’re the sensors. If they don’t trust the data, leadership won’t either.
3. Regular reporting loops. Not every minute, but often enough to detect drift. Think heartbeat, not MRI.
4. Signal diversity. Combine quantitative metrics (throughput, cycle time, revenue per client) with qualitative signals (customer sentiment, employee feedback).
5. Decision rules. Define what different signal patterns mean and who is empowered to act. A spike in churn requires a different response than a slow decline in engagement.
6. Respect for local context. The brain shouldn’t override every local decision. Allow organs to self-regulate unless the feedback indicates systemic risk.
⸻
A short, practical checklist for leaders
• Stop asking for “everything.” Ask for the 5 signals that would keep you from being surprised.
• Make teams report on outcomes, not activities. Activities are noisy; outcomes tell truth.
• Invest in simple dashboards that people trust — and then treat them as conversation starters, not verdicts.
• Teach managers pattern recognition: what does a minor blip look like versus a creeping performance loss?
• Measure the measurement: are your signals being gamed? If yes, fix the incentive, not the dashboard.
⸻
Final note: less seeing, more sensing
People often want leadership to “see more” — more details, more updates, more oversight. But the real goal isn’t visibility for its own sake. It’s to have a functioning sensory system that gives the right kinds of signals at the right cadence so leadership can decide what to do and when.
Because in the end, it’s not about seeing everything — it’s about having the right signal system in place that allows you to decide when and how you need to act.
If your organisation feels like it lives on antibiotics and consultants, maybe the microbiome is trying to tell you something. Listen. Build the sensors. And for heaven’s sake, don’t panic when you see a single red dot on a dashboard — learn what that dot usually means first.
This reflection comes from years of observing how large organisations breathe, adapt, and occasionally panic. The more I see, the more I believe that sustainable success isn’t about having perfect vision — it’s about building a body that can truly feel what’s going on inside it.
How well does your organisation’s “nervous system” really work — are you sensing what’s happening, or just reacting when something hurts? Looking forward to read your answers in the comments.
Thanks for reading.
Note: I used AI assistance for grammar, structure, and proofreading — as I do for all articles I’ve published since November 2025.
Go Back
